Include your dataset

Pilkonis Personality Studies: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II)
Internal Dataset

UID: 34

Author(s): Pilkonis, Paul*+ * Corresponding Author + University of Pittsburgh Author
Description

This data package contains SPSS data and codebooks for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II) assessment used in several personality studies conducted 1990-2017 by Paul Pilkonis.

Associated study:

  1. Interpersonal Functioning in Borderline Personality ("Interpersonal Functioning")

Data and codebooks are provided for the study listed above, as well as a fuller description of the SCID-II assessment. For background demographic data on the participants in these studies, see the Related Dataset: Pilkonis Personality Studies: Background Information Questionnaire (BIQ).

Timeframe
1990 - 2017
Subject of Study
Humans
Population Age
Adult
Subject Gender
Male
Female
Subject Sex
Male
Female
Keywords
Borderline Personality Disorder
Interpersonal Relations
Personality Assessment
Personality Disorders
Psychiatry
Access via D-Scholarship

SPSS data and Microsoft Word documentation related to the "Interpersonal Functioning" study.
Accession #: 35863

Access Restrictions
Free to all
Access Instructions
Free to access through University of Pittsburgh's D-Scholarship institutional repository.
Data Type
Behavioral
Software Used
SPSS

Software package used for statistical analysis.

Dataset Format(s)
SPSS data file (.SAV), DOC (.doc, .docx, .docm)
Resource Type(s)
Dataset
Dataset Size
235 kB
Data Catalog Record Updated
2020-07-27

Notice and Disclaimer: Please note that the information in this catalog is provided as a courtesy, as is, and with no representations or warranties of any kind. When you contact the responsible individual(s) listed in each record, or, where applicable, access a data repository listed, you will be subject to terms and conditions required by the data custodian/data repository. The University of Pittsburgh does not attempt to judge the scholarly quality of the data referenced and relies on the judgment and research expertise of those who created and/or deposited it.